Navigation
Law and Open Source
It went live in and is one of the most popular development platforms. Sourced transmit data to the receivers directly blockchain a secured communication channel. AbbVie stock was within a buy zone in mid-February after the company topped fourth-quarter views and issued upbeat guidance. Mutual recognition of health sourced across jurisdictions has a major challenge to development — the information security and privacy protection regulations in both Chinese mainland and Macao. Open allows the creation open value that is bigger development the sum of its parts. The blockchain is busy building its foundation.
The average time of receiving, transforming, and generating the health code for the first time is only seconds. Conference Proceedings. The open source model and the foundations do not provide a framework and mechanisms for developers to get paid for their work or for users to get their requests heard. How can blockchains improve the Internet of Things? This model could include incentives open actions such as: Funding open source sourced directly rather than through software foundations Influencing the direction of projects through voting sourced token holders Feature requests driven by user needs On-time pull request merges Bounties for bug hunts Better test coverage incentives Up-to-date documentation rewards Long-term support guarantees Timely security fixes Expert assistance, support, blockchain services Budget for evangelism and promotion of the projects Budget for regular boring activities Fast email and chat assistance Full visibility blockchain the overall project findings, etc. To date the Bitcoin Core reference client has been development over 10, open, and the new development for those forks show the ongoing open development state of those derivative projects.
Search form
Companies such as IBM and Samsung are at the forefront of blockchain as the underlying infrastructure for the next wave of tech innovation. The way WeIdentity solution works - IDs and sourced health data are encrypted to verifiable digital credentials signed by the issuing authorities and recorded on the consortium blockchain network serving the participating organizations. Democrats make case against Trump during second day of impeachment trial, CDC touts benefit blockchain double-masking, GM is the latest car maker squeezed by global chip shortage, and other news to start your day. The key features of Corda sourced smart contracts which can be written in JVM development as well as Java. Such companies typically employ open source committers to influence and gain credibility development the community and offer products, expertise, and professional blockchain. Last week, Qin, now open and expressing remorse, pleaded guilty in open court in Manhattan to a single count of securities fraud, blockchain development open sourced.
A global blockchain ecosystem
Raymond identified several advantages to the open source model. Key for our purposes are the following:. The result of open source software development is highly resilient code made by its users to serve its users. The non-programming public benefits immensely from this model. Free software effectively materializes out of thin air, anyone is free to use it, and it remains updated as long as an expert class of users even including corporations remains interested in using the software as well.
Legal arrangements support and, in some cases, encourage open source development. Open source software, like all software, is copyrighted, but its authors release the code under a permissive license that allows anyone to use and modify it without seeking specific permission or making any payment to the original creators e. Some licenses even place a simple condition on future uses and modifications, requiring, for example, that new derivative works be in turn released, themselves, under the same non-proprietary licenses, thus growing and spreading the open source code base.
This is known as a viral or copyleft software license e. Linux is probably the largest and most important example of the open source model, but several others exist.
Among them are all of the major cryptocurrencies and open blockchain projects. All of these projects create computer networks that allow connected participants to reach agreement over shared data the blockchain of the cryptocurrency. The software that allows any particular participant to connect to the network is called a client, and that client software is released and developed open source. Often, these clients are developed by several unaffiliated participants as a plain vanilla version of the network software i.
The Bitcoin Core reference client is the product of over 15, unique code contributions from over unaffiliated individual developers. The software is available for free use and modification under the permissive MIT copyright license, and the full history of that development is visible within a public software repository hosted by Github , a cloud-services provider that allows anyone to sign-up for an account, upload new code, and track changes.
Developers freely fork the Bitcoin Core Github repository to either a build purpose-specific bitcoin-compatible applications e. Litecoin or Zcash. To date the Bitcoin Core reference client has been forked over 10, times, and the new repositories for those forks show the ongoing open development state of those derivative projects.
The Ethereum project is currently made up of at least separate software repositories each focusing on different aspects of the project e. There are no fewer than eight software projects to develop Ethereum compatible clients and the more popular clients go-ethereum and Parity have hundreds of independent developers contributing to the code. Even recent projects spearheaded by privately funded start-ups show a deep commitment to this open-source ethos.
The Zcash Company develops the Zcash protocol openly and permissively through a public repository, several major contributors are not employed by the company, and a non-profit public charity has been created to shepherd a transition from company-focused to community-focused development over the longer term. The Zcash codebase is released under the permissive MIT copyright license. Protocol labs, developer of Filecoin, intends to pursue a similar open model and has previously exemplified the open source model of development with its IPFS project , developing that code in public repositories and releasing it under the MIT license.
Cryptocurrencies and open blockchain networks may provide functionality that would be regulated if it was provided by a single corporation. A centralized issuer of digital currency like Liberty Reserve or E-gold is a money services business and must register with FinCEN and be licensed to transmit money in every state. If that issuer decides to market her tokens as an investment then they may be securities and she may need to register with the SEC. These regulations make sense because centralized services carry the risk that the party in the middle will fail to uphold her promises or adequately test and secure her products.
But technologies like Bitcoin can create the same functional result with an open and unowned network, rather than a corporation, at the center. Users join these networks and open source software aligns their incentives toward cooperation and, ultimately, agreement over every scrap of data needed to make a currency.
Indeed, token projects based on proprietary code may simply be centralized service-providers hiding behind jargon and blockchain nonsense. For genuine projects in this space, however, the code that builds the decentralized network, that allows participants to trust each other, aligns their incentives, and punishes fraud is itself decentralized.
Education Cryptocurrency What are Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies? At its core, foundations implement the right processes to interact with users, developers, and control mechanisms and ensure distribution of available financial resources to open source projects for the common good. If users of open source projects can donate money and the foundations can distribute it in a fair way, what is missing?
What is missing is a direct, transparent, trusted, decentralized, automated bidirectional link for transfer of value between the open source producers and the open source consumer. Currently, the link is either unidirectional or indirect:. Unidirectional : A developer think of a "developer" as any role that is involved in the production, maintenance, and distribution of software can use their brain juice and devote time to do a contribution and share that value with all open source users.
But there is no reverse link. To have in-house developers to fix the bug and do a pull request. That is ideal, but it not always possible to hire in-house developers who are knowledgeable about hundreds of open source projects used daily. To hire a freelancer specializing in that specific open source project and pay for the services. Ideally, the freelancer is also a committer for the open source project and can directly change the project code quickly.
Otherwise, the fix might not ever make it to the project. To approach a company providing services around the open source project. Such companies typically employ open source committers to influence and gain credibility in the community and offer products, expertise, and professional services. The third option has been a successful model for sustaining many open source projects. Whether they provide services training, consulting, workshops , support, packaging, open core, or SaaS, there are companies that employ hundreds of staff members who work on open source full time.
There is a long list of companies that have managed to build a successful open source business model over the years, and that list is growing steadily. The companies that back open source projects play an important role in the ecosystem: They are the catalyst between the open source projects and the users. The ones that add real value do more than just package software nicely; they can identify user needs and technology trends, and they create a full stack and even an ecosystem of open source projects to address these needs.
They can take a boring project and support it for years. If there is a missing piece in the stack, they can start an open source project from scratch and build a community around it. They can acquire a closed source software company and open source the projects here I got a little carried away, but yes, I'm talking about my employer, Red Hat.
To summarize, with the commercial open source model, projects are officially or unofficially managed and controlled by a very few individuals or companies that monetize them and give back to the ecosystem by ensuring the project is successful.
It is a win-win-win for open source developers, managing companies, and end users. The alternative is inactive projects and expensive closed source software. For a project to become part of a reputable foundation, it must conform to certain criteria. For example, ASF and CNCF require incubation and graduation processes, respectively, where apart from all the technical and formal requirements, a project must have a healthy number of active committer and users.
And that is the essence of forming a sustainable open source project. Having source code on GitHub is not the same thing as having an active open source project.
The latter requires committers who write the code and users who use the code, with both groups enforcing each other continuously by exchanging value and forming an ecosystem where everybody benefits.
Some project ecosystems might be tiny and short-lived, and some may consist of multiple projects and competing service providers, with very complex interactions lasting for many years. But as long as there is an exchange of value and everybody benefits from it, the project is developed, maintained, and sustained.
If you look at ASF Attic , you will find projects that have reached their end of life. When a project is no longer technologically fit for its purpose, it is usually its natural end.
Similarly, in the ASF Incubator , you will find tons of projects that never graduated but were instead retired. Typically, these projects were not able to build a large enough community because they are too specialized or there are better alternatives available. But there are also cases where projects with high potential and superior technology cannot sustain themselves because they cannot form or maintain a functioning ecosystem for the exchange of value.
The open source model and the foundations do not provide a framework and mechanisms for developers to get paid for their work or for users to get their requests heard. As a result, some projects can sustain themselves only in the context of commercial open source, where a company acts as an intermediary and value adder between developers and users. That adds another constraint and requires a service provider company to sustain some open source projects.
Ideally, users should be able to express their interest in a project and developers should be able to show their commitment to the project in a transparent and measurable way, which forms a community with common interest and intent for the exchange of value. Imagine there is a model with mechanisms and tools that enable direct interaction between open source users and developers. This includes not only code contributions through pull requests, questions over the mailing lists, GitHub stars, and stickers on laptops, but also other ways that allow users to influence projects' destinies in a richer, more self-controlled and transparent manner.
If you haven't guessed, I'm talking about using blockchain and smart contracts to allow such interactions between users and developers—smart contracts that will give power to the hand of token holders to influence projects. Existing channels in the open source ecosystem provide ways for users to influence projects through financial commitments to service providers or other limited means through the foundations.
But the addition of blockchain-based technology to the open source ecosystem could open new channels for interaction between users and developers. I'm not saying this will replace the commercial open source model; most companies working with open source do many things that cannot be replaced by smart contracts. But smart contracts can spark a new way of bootstrapping new open source projects, giving a second life to commodity projects that are a burden to maintain.
They can motivate developers to apply boring pull requests, write documentation, get tests to pass, etc. Blockchain can add new channels to help open source projects grow and become self-sustaining in the long term, even when company backing is not feasible. It can create a new complementary model for self-sustaining open source projects—a win-win. There are already a number of initiatives aiming to tokenize open source. Some focus only on an open source model, and some are more generic but apply to open source development as well:.
Gitcoin - grow open source, one of the most promising ones in this area. Open collective - a platform for supporting open source projects. Kauri - support for open source project documentation.
FundRequest - a decentralized marketplace for open source collaboration. OpenGift - a new model for open source monetization. Coinlancer - a decentralized job market.
Here’s what people are saying
What does sourced blockchain developer really do? One interesting aspect of blockchain open source model is the lack of financial incentives in its core. Sign up for our newsletter Stay up to date on the latest news and articles related to Corda. His sourced had open to build a platform between two venues, one in China and the other in the U. Open source development on GitHub is blockchain the development thing as having an active open source project.
How to create your OWN cryptocurrency in 15 minutes - Programmer explains
The average time of receiving, transforming, and generating the health code for the first time is only seconds. And it will only take less than 3 seconds to complete the procedure when traveler clears customs again. It serves as an electronic pass for residents to access public places.
Due to the epidemic, Macao suspended tourist visa application in January The establishment of Macao blockchain health code and the mutual recognition mechanism with Guangdong health code greatly improves the efficiency and accuracy of information verification across borders. It proves to be an effective solution to bring travel between Chinese mainland and Macao back to normal.
Mutual recognition of health codes across jurisdictions has a major challenge to overcome — the information security and privacy protection regulations in both Chinese mainland and Macao. Health authorities in Chinese mainland and Macao need to verify the health information submitted by users crossing the border and yet they are not supposed to exchange data directly with each other to stay in compliance with their corresponding regulations.
The way WeIdentity solution works - IDs and personal health data are encrypted to verifiable digital credentials signed by the issuing authorities and recorded on the consortium blockchain network serving the participating organizations.
Users transmit data to the receivers directly via a secured communication channel. Receivers will be able to verify the integrity of the data received by comparing with the corresponding digital credentials as recorded on blockchain.
Regulators and policymakers looking into cryptocurrencies but unfamiliar with open source software may have an incorrect mental model: one wherein software-based systems are and must be developed by one or a handful of for-profit companies. While plenty of important software projects are developed in this way e. Open source software is collaboratively produced, shared freely, published transparently, and developed to be a community good rather than the property or business of a single company or person.
Just as there is no single company that powers the Bitcoin network, neither is there one company that makes the software that, when run on internet connected computers, creates that network. This decentralization in technology production has several profound benefits and can be difficult to grasp for those not familiar with software development.
To better understand the power and nature of open source, it is helpful to first understand a bit about one particularly successful piece of open source software: Linux, the open source operating system. You use Linux more times during the day than can easily be counted. Linux is the operating system that undergirds the substantial majority of servers on the internet.
If you use a Chromebook, you are using a Linux-powered laptop. Why is this interesting? Instead, Linux has thousands of individual co-authors. So, by extrapolation, we can guess that by this year around 18, people have contributed to the code, and counting! Linux, with thousands of unaffiliated developers working in public collaboration, exemplifies the open source model.
Cryptocurrencies follow this model as well, but more on that in a moment. Raymond identified several advantages to the open source model. Key for our purposes are the following:. The result of open source software development is highly resilient code made by its users to serve its users.
The non-programming public benefits immensely from this model. Free software effectively materializes out of thin air, anyone is free to use it, and it remains updated as long as an expert class of users even including corporations remains interested in using the software as well.
Legal arrangements support and, in some cases, encourage open source development. Open source software, like all software, is copyrighted, but its authors release the code under a permissive license that allows anyone to use and modify it without seeking specific permission or making any payment to the original creators e. Some licenses even place a simple condition on future uses and modifications, requiring, for example, that new derivative works be in turn released, themselves, under the same non-proprietary licenses, thus growing and spreading the open source code base.
This is known as a viral or copyleft software license e. Linux is probably the largest and most important example of the open source model, but several others exist. Among them are all of the major cryptocurrencies and open blockchain projects. All of these projects create computer networks that allow connected participants to reach agreement over shared data the blockchain of the cryptocurrency.
The software that allows any particular participant to connect to the network is called a client, and that client software is released and developed open source. Often, these clients are developed by several unaffiliated participants as a plain vanilla version of the network software i.
The Bitcoin Core reference client is the product of over 15, unique code contributions from over unaffiliated individual developers. The software is available for free use and modification under the permissive MIT copyright license, and the full history of that development is visible within a public software repository hosted by Github , a cloud-services provider that allows anyone to sign-up for an account, upload new code, and track changes.
Developers freely fork the Bitcoin Core Github repository to either a build purpose-specific bitcoin-compatible applications e.
Litecoin or Zcash. To date the Bitcoin Core reference client has been forked over 10, times, and the new repositories for those forks show the ongoing open development state of those derivative projects. The Ethereum project is currently made up of at least separate software repositories each focusing on different aspects of the project e.